MUSIC 344

Encounters with Music History

Links on this page
Introduction
Readings & Research Tools
Discussion
Paper Preparation
Listening
Score Study
Links to Encounters with Music History
Encounter
1
Encounter
2
Encounter
3
Encounter
4
Encounter
5
Encounter
6
Encounter
7
Encounter
8

Return to Music 344 Syllabus


Introduction

Encounters with music history can change your life. The nine assignments you undertake this semester provide various encounters with music history. These encounters offer the most important means to help you achieve the goals for this course— Further, each assignment offers a unique encounter with music history, a cluster of activities focused on a particular historical topic. That should come as no surprise given the striking changes that occur in musical styles, techniques, and institutions as we move through time. Nonetheless, as the year progresses you will find that we return again and again to the same basic tools—readings, research, discussion, paper preparation, listening, and score study. This page looks at each tool and describes its importance, both within the discipline of music history and for your development as musicians.

Return to top
Return to Music 344 Syllabus


Readings & Research Tools

Reading remains a primary avenue for learning about music history. Figuring out what to read requires developing a knowledge of important research tools (information literacy). Your textbook provides one important source of information, but serious scholars use a wide variety of sources (with special emphasis on primary sources). In your Encounters you will encounter many of the principal resource types used for music research, and most of these require that you use the library’s print or online resources. The lists below offer a preview of these types with explanation of each one.

Primary & Secondary Sources—A primary source is any resource that puts you in direct contact with the thing you are studying, without anyone else’s interpretation, editorial decisions, or other judgments getting in the way. Primary sources can include musical scores (in the original version), letters and other writings by composers and other musicians, criticism, programs, advertisements, instruments, works of art, buildings, and so on. By contrast, in a secondary source a later scholar interprets the facts and organizes them in a coherent narrative. Of course, depending on the subject of your study, the same source could be either primary or secondary. If you are studying performance practices during Beethoven’s lifetime, then a Gramophone review of a CD recording of Beethoven’s music on pianoforte is a secondary source. That same review becomes a primary source, however, if you are studying changing reactions to Beethoven’s music. As you look at the sources in each category below, bear in mind that any source could be primary or secondary—depending on the subject of your research.
 

Primary Sources
Secondary Sources & Research Tools
Other Sources

Return to top
Return to Music 344 Syllabus
 

Primary Sources

Back to Primary & Secondary Sources

Secondary Sources & Research Tools

Back to Primary & Secondary Sources

Other Sources


Back to Primary & Secondary Sources
Return to top
Return to Music 344 Syllabus


Online Discussion

Scholarly work may seem like a lonely endeavor, but serious advances in music research require the participation of a community of scholars. In the section on Course Goals, the syllabus mentions that “our ideas and interpretations (hypotheses) must be tested by the scholarly community.” No matter how compelling a scholar’s arguments may be, they are not accepted as valid until that scholar’s ideas and interpretations are evaluated and tested by other experts in the field.

To keep alive that sense of the “community of scholars,” your encounters with music history will from time to time ask you to engage in online discussion of selected topics. These discussions will ask you to make your best judgments on a topic and to evaluate the judgments of other students in this course. This process of community interaction provides an important means of coming closer to the “truth” of the matter.

Return to top
Return to Music 344 Syllabus


Paper Preparation

This paper demands serious research, and serious research takes time—one-night wonders won’t help you understand what musicologists do. It takes time to do background research and preparation, to assemble all necessary sources, to study primary sources carefully, and to develop your own understanding and interpretation of those sources—to grasp their meaning as fully as possible. At the same time, big projects work best when you break them down into small, manageable steps. Several of your encounters with music history will guide you through some important steps in preparing your paper. After all, your paper will be better if you spread the work out over two or three months. Click here for more information about the paper itself.

Return to top
Return to Music 344 Syllabus


Listening

Why listen?
Would anyone care about U2, the Beatles, Miles, or even N Sync if they couldn’t listen to their music? Listening remains the most immediate means of grasping musical meaning, and yet this very immediacy lies at the heart of an unusual paradox. We readily grasp music’s meaning at an intuitive or emotional level, but to bring our understanding to a conscious level and to communicate musical meaning in words can be extremely difficult. Hearing is not enough to accomplish these goals. This task requires active listening, and the Listening Reports that accompany each Encounter will help you develop necessary skills.

What is style?
Active listening can mean many things. In music theory it can mean identifying intervals, harmonic progressions, or phrase relationships. In this course it means attempting to place a work in its historical context by listening for all its features, especially those that contribute to our sense of its style. Style, simply put, is the characteristic way a musical work (or body of works) uses the elements of music—melody, texture, rhythm, color, harmony, dynamics, form, and so on—to create a unique, identifiable sound. We can talk about the style of a particular work, of a composer, of a school, of a nation, or of an entire era, but in each case we listen carefully for the characteristic elements of that style. A well-developed sense of style enables us to determine a work’s place in music history and to understand how music changes over time.

Listening for style features
Style listening requires that you give full attention to all elements of music. When you first begin to listen for style features, however, it’s natural to focus on one or two elements that are easy for you. To avoid falling into this trap, use the handy checklist below. The list also includes questions and terms to help steer you in the right direction. Don’t hesitate to look it up or ask if you’re uncertain what these words mean—it’s crucial that you understand.

What is a Listening Report?
An integral part of each Encounter, Listening Reports help you practice listening skills and prepare for listening quizzes while you explore the music we study. These reports should be written while you listen. For an example of proper format, click here to see a sample of Listening Report No. 1.

Listening Report Format?
For each piece you listen to:

a. identify the title and location (library and call number) of the recording
b. identify composer and title (for the entire piece and for each individual section)
c. describe style features—write 2-3 sentences on each movement or number
d. answer any questions in the Encounter
e. indicate number of times (1X, 2X, etc.) you listen to any piece required for quiz preparation
How much listening?
The amount varies from 2 to 3.5 hours of music per report; plan on at least 2 hours. Basic guideline—listen to one complete LP or CD (or the equivalent) for each hour assigned.

Where to listen?
You can use listening facilities in Irion 202, at the Media Center (CSTC 109), or you can use your own listening equipment.

What to listen to?
For most reports, specific pieces are required, but after that you can choose any recordings (or live performances!) that fit the current Encounter. Start with music from NAWM so you can follow the score while you listen. A primary goal is to experience as much music as possible. Therefore, you can only count one playing of each piece in your total listening time. (Exception: You can count multiple listening for any piece that is scheduled for a listening recognition quiz.) Recording can be found in Irion 202 or the Media Center (CSTC 109). (NAWM recordings are on Reserve in both locations.) You can also use appropriate recordings of your own.

Return to top
Return to Music 344 Syllabus


Score Study

Listening may provide more visceral pleasure than score study, but looking at scores is just as important as listening—and for the same reasons that listening is so crucial. In fact, listening to a performance and mentally reading through a score are not necessarily two different things. Highly trained musicians can “hear” the lines in the score and assemble them in their heads, and that skill is one of the ultimate goals of ear-training and sight=singing exercises in music theory. Even if you have not yet reached that level of sophistication in your own listening, score study remains an invaluable tool in music history. Remember, in most cases the score is the primary source, and the score can often help you spot style features that are difficult to hear, aspects of texture, rhythm, or form, for instance. Further, each score has a “look” that is just as distinctive as the sound of its music. Sensitivity to the visual appearance of a score offers another important tool for the analysis of musical style. Each unit exam will include score excerpts that will test your developing ability “make sense” of written scores.

Return to top
Return to Music 344 Syllabus


Page created 6/12/01 by Mark Harbold—last updated 2/06/01.