Music 343

Encounters with Music History

Fall 2020


Links on this page
Introduction
Readings & Research Tools
Discussion
Paper Preparation
Listening
Score Study

Links to Encounters with Music History
Encounter
1
Encounter
2
Encounter
3
Encounter
4
Encounter
5
Encounter
6


Encounters with Music History

Introduction

Encounters with music history can change your life.
  • As a result of ongoing encounters with musicologists studying German Renaissance and Baroque music, Romantic composer Johannes Brahms wrote several landmark works using techniques, forms, and melodies that had little to do with the prevailing style of his era.
  • As a result of his encounter with medieval polyphony from Notre Dame Cathedral, minimalist composer Steve Reich found inspiration and affirmation for his techniques of pattern repetition, counterpoint, continuous variation
  • As a result of his encounter with ancient Greek writings on music and theater, avant garde composer Harry Partch abandoned equal temperament and created musical systems based solely on the overtones of a single fundamental pitch
  • As a result of their encounter with early blues recordings by Robert Johnson (and others), a whole generation of 1960s musicians began to take rock music in new directions
The six assignments you undertake this semester provide various encounters with music history. These encounters offer the most important means to help you achieve the goals for this course—
  1. to acquire basic research skills and information literacy as you gather, evaluate, and interpret primary and secondary sources
  2. to communicate your research using varied styles (written and oral) and media appropriate to the purpose and the audience
  3. to study major Western musical styles, composers, and works (up to 1750) through readings, score study, and aural analysis
    • to develop listening skills & critical descriptive prose necessary for stylistic analysis
  4. to engage in various types of historical analysis appropriate for music research
  5. to explore events and cultures that influenced musical styles and composers
    • to discover how the past touches and influences the present
Further, each assignment offers a unique encounter with music history, a cluster of activities focused on a particular historical period. That should come as no surprise given the striking changes that occur in musical styles, techniques, and institutions as we move through time. Nonetheless, as the year progresses you will find that we return again and again to the same basic tools—readings, research, discussion, paper preparation, listening, and score study. This page looks at each tool and describes its importance, both within the discipline of music history and for your development as musicians.

Return to top


Readings & Research Tools

Reading remains a primary avenue for learning about music history. Figuring out what to read requires developing a knowledge of important research tools (information literacy). Figuring out what do to with what you read takes you into the realm of historical analysis. Your textbook provides one important source of information, but serious scholars use a wide variety of sources (with special emphasis on primary sources). In your Encounters you will encounter many of the principal resource types used for music research, and most of these require that you use the library’s print or online resources. The lists below offer a preview of these types with explanation of each one.

 

Primary & Secondary Sources
A primary source is any resource that puts you in direct contact with the thing you are studying, without anyone else’s interpretation, editorial decisions, or other judgments getting in the way. Primary sources can include musical scores (in the original version), letters and other writings by composers and other musicians, criticism, programs, advertisements, instruments, works of art, buildings, and so on. By contrast, in a secondary source a later scholar interprets the facts and organizes them in a coherent narrative. Of course, depending on the subject of your study, the same source could be either primary or secondary. If you are studying performance practices during Beethoven’s lifetime, then a Gramophone review of a CD recording of Beethoven’s music on pianoforte is a secondary source. That same review becomes a primary source, however, if you are studying changing reactions to Beethoven’s music. As you look at the sources in each category below, bear in mind that any source could be primary or secondary—depending on the subject of your research.

Return to top

Primary Sources
Secondary Sources & Research Tools
Other Sources

Primary Sources

  • Musical scores
    Any scores, in a format as close as possible to the composer’s original, are considered primary sources, perhaps the most important primary sources in music research. The composer’s own autograph score is the true primary source for any work, but a printed edition supervised by a conscientious editor is an acceptable substitute. Many of these are readily available (as free downloads!) on the IMSLP Petrucci Music Library website. Be careful, though—some scores include expression markings and fingerings added by the editor; such interpretations can turn these scores into secondary sources.
  • Score anthologies
    As the name suggests, these are collections of musical compositions. Your music history book comes with a score anthology; so do many period histories. Other anthologies are organized by repertory. The Liber usualis is the most comprehensive collection of Gregorian chant melodies, and 20th century “fake books” provide valuable compilations of jazz and pop song classics. To the extent that anthologies give you scores in a format as close as possible to the composer’s original, they are primary sources.
  • Scholarly Editions of Early Manuscripts and Printed Sources
    A surprising number of music anthologies from the Middle Ages and Renaissance still exist, though in many cases there is only one copy. Many of these anthologies have been microfilmed, and large music libraries possess a large collection on microfilm or microfiche. For the rest of us, however, scholarly editions serve a valuable purpose. In a typical scholarly edition, the editor provides as much information as possible about physical features and condition of the book or manuscript; a historical sketch describing how it came into existence and the various editions it went through; a comparison of each piece with other versions of the same piece in other sources; and commentary on each piece in the book. And, of course, the scholarly edition transcribes every score into modern notation. If you can’t get to the original, this is the next best thing, and it counts as a primary source. In our Renaissance unit, we’ll look at Hewitt’s scholarly edition of Canti B.
  • Source Readings
    Any book with the phrase “source readings” in the title provides a collection of primary sources—usually writings by composers and other musicians. These are especially valuable because they include in a single volume writings that would otherwise be very difficult to find and collect. Women in Music and Strunk’s Source Readings in Music History are good examples of the genre.
  • Criticism
    Music critics have been around for a long time, writing for journals, magazines, and newspapers. Some of them have even been composers—Schumann, Berlioz, and Cage to name a few! Regardless of authorship, criticism is a valuable primary source that allows us to understand how a composer’s contemporaries regarded their works. However, criticism is not a primary source when it is not written during the composer’s lifetime. For example, in Beethoven research a review of a modern pianist playing Beethoven is considered a secondary source.
  • Documentary Biography
    A primary source goldmine! For several important composers, scholars have assembled all of the primary documents related to a composer’s life—birth certificate, letters, payment receipts, contracts, newspaper articles, concert programs, and so on—into a single collection. If you are studying Josquin, Bach, Handel, Mozart, Schubert, and several others, you must consult these significant sources.
Back to Primary & Secondary Sources

Secondary Sources & Research Tools

  • Music Encyclopedias & Dictionaries
    While these are secondary sources, they provide excellent starting points for quick answers to questions or for serious research projects. The New Grove Dictionary of Music and Musicians (Grove Music Online) is without question the place to start any research project, especially since every article contains a bibliography that lists other important primary and secondary sources. Old encyclopedias and dictionaries can be primary sources, however—in a study of Renaissance music, the Dictionary of Musical Terms written by 15th century composer Tinctoris is a primary source.
  • Scholarly Journals
    Periodical publications like the Musical Quarterly or the Journal of the American Musicological Society demonstrate the scholarly interests, research methods, and writing style of contemporary musicologists. While these are secondary sources, they take you to the cutting edge of modern musicology.
  • Online Databases
    How do you find out if there are scholarly journal articles on your topic? Databases allow you to search for articles and reviews published in scholarly journals, magazines, and other periodical publications. The most important databases for music research are RILM and The Music Index.
  • Biography
    Biographies can be primary sources if they are written by a composer (autobiography) or by friends and acquaintances of a composer (Robert Craft’s writings on Stravinsky, for instance). Most biographies are secondary sources, however, though the really good ones will quote primary sources at length (Thayer’s Life of Beethoven, e.g). Biographies tend to cover both the events of a composer’s life and the development of their musical style, with careful attention paid to the most important compositions.
  • Period Histories
    These extremely useful secondary sources provide excellent background material for the study of any composer or style. A period history looks carefully at the important composers and musical styles from a specific period of music history, either Middle Ages, Renaissance, Baroque, Classical, Romantic, or 20th century. Typical titles are Music in the Baroque Era or Music of the Renaissance. Especially good are the period histories published by W. W. Norton and Pearson/Prentice Hall.
  • Social Histories & Cultural Studies
    Reflecting a recent trend in musicology, these books look not only at composers and their music but also at the social institutions that support music and at the cultures in which music exists. Some, including Fenlon’s The Renaissance, focus on a specific period, while others, notably Raynor’s Social History of Music & Music and Society Since 1815 are broader in scope. These secondary sources are especially helpful for the Music 343 paper.
  • Stylistic analysis
    This specialized genre offers research tools that deal with helpful considerations and techniques for the description and analysis of musical styles. Representative works include histories of musical styles and LaRue’s Guidelines for Style Analysis.
  • Performance Studies
    What did early music performances sound like? What makes Ella sound different than Lady Day? These questions fall in the realm of performance studies. Due to the 20th century early music revival, many books are now available that describe how music was performed in past eras of music history. For the Music 343 paper it is extremely important to know about past performance practices. Despite their age, Dart’s Interpretation of Music and Donington’s Interpretation of Early Music provide decent overviews, but there are many current books that go into much more detail. These are generally secondary sources, though there were primary source treatises written in the Renaissance and Baroque that deal precisely with these issues.
Back to Primary & Secondary Sources

Other Sources

  • Recordings and Recorded Anthologies
    You would think that audio and video recordings would be just as important as the written score, since they translate the score into the sounds we call music. But performance introduces an element of interpretation that may or may not take us closer to the composer’s intentions; therefore recorded performances of written scores are considered secondary sources. Important exceptions include performances that involve the composer as director, performer, or consultant, or where an improvising musician creates the music spontaneously, as in jazz recordings. In these cases, recordings become primary sources. Recorded anthologies can provide a valuable collection of works that would be difficult or expensive to find individually. Examples include the Norton Anthology of Western Music, The Best of DooWop, and the Smithsonian Collection of Classic Jazz.
  • Web Pages
    Web sites have become increasingly important sources of information in recent years. Especially useful are sites that make primary source materials available. However, these sources must be used with care. Not only are most of them secondary sources, the majority of music web pages merely summarize information you can find in more authoritative, comprehensive sources. Why take three-day-old leftovers when you can go to the banquet?
  • Music Magazines
    These publications are rarely useful to the serious scholar. Whether the magazine is Opera News, BBC Magazine, High Fidelity, American Stereo Review, Downbeat, Electronic Musician, or something similar, these are secondary sources geared towards the interests of a particular niche market. If you are studying Bach, Handel, Mozart, or Beethoven, these magazines usually say nothing that you can’t find in more authoritative sources. On the other hand, if you are studying 20th century opera production techniques, the development of commercial MIDI keyboards, the early music revival from the 1960s to the present, or interviews with Miles Davis, then Opera News, Electronic Musician, High Fidelity, and Downbeat (respectively) become extremely valuable, and often primary, sources.
  • Historical fiction
    Based on historical figures, but often very loose with the facts, many of these works have found their way onto best-seller lists over the last several decades. Barbara Lachman’s Journal of Hildegard of Bingen is exceptional in its faithfulness to the historical record, while Peter Shaffer’s Amadeus, though a stunning, challenging piece of theater, stretches most of the facts to make Salieri’s guilt plausible. No matter how well done, historical fiction can make us think, but it is not a tool for serious musical research.
  • Online Listening Guides & Multimedia Software
    The primary value of these resources lies in their ability to put side-by-side the recording, analysis of the music, and background information on the composer, the style, and the culture. In most cases these are secondary sources, as with the the NAWM Student Web Site. Nonetheless, when the composer helps to create it (Saariaho’s Prisma or Subotnick’s All My Hummingbirds Have Alibis), or when many significant historical documents are included (Dvořák’s New World Symphony), then these can be considered primary sources.
Back to Primary & Secondary Sources
Return to top


Online Discussion

Scholarly work may seem like a lonely endeavor, but serious advances in music research require the participation of a community of scholars. In the section on Course Goals, the syllabus mentions that “our ideas and interpretations (hypotheses) must be tested by the scholarly community.” No matter how compelling a scholar’s arguments may be, they are not accepted as valid until that scholar’s ideas and interpretations are evaluated and tested by other experts in the field.

To keep alive that sense of the “community of scholars,” your encounters with music history will from time to time ask you to engage in online discussion of selected topics. These discussions will ask you to make your best judgments on a topic and to evaluate the judgments of other students in this course. This process of community interaction provides an important means of coming closer to the “truth” of the matter.

Return to top


Paper Preparation

This paper demands serious research, and serious research takes time—one-night wonders won’t help you understand what musicologists do. It takes time to do background research and preparation, to assemble all necessary sources, to study primary sources carefully, and to develop your own understanding and interpretation of those sources—to grasp their meaning as fully as possible. At the same time, big projects work best when you break them down into small, manageable steps. Most of your encounters with music history will guide you through some important steps in preparing your paper. After all, your paper will be better if you spread the work out over two or three months. Click here for more information about the paper itself.

Return to top


Listening

Why listen?
Would anyone care about U2, the Roots, the Beatles, Miles, or even Justin Bieber if they couldn’t listen to their music? Listening remains the most immediate means of grasping musical meaning, and yet this very immediacy lies at the heart of a curious paradox. We readily grasp music’s meaning at an intuitive or emotional level, but to bring our understanding to a conscious level and to communicate musical meaning in words can be extremely difficult. Hearing is not enough to accomplish these goals. This task requires active listening, and the Listening Assignments that accompany each Encounter will help you develop necessary skills.

What is style?
Active listening can mean many things. In music theory it can mean identifying intervals, harmonic progressions, or phrase relationships. In this course it means attempting to place a work in its historical context by listening for all its features, especially those that contribute to our sense of its style. Style, simply put, is the characteristic way a musical work (or body of works) uses the elements of music—melody, texture, rhythm, color, harmony, dynamics, form, and so on—to create a unique, identifiable sound. We can talk about the style of a particular work, of a composer, of a school, of a nation, or of an entire era, but in each case we listen carefully for the characteristic elements of that style. A well-developed sense of style enables us to determine a work’s place in music history and to understand how music changes over time.

Listening for style features
Style listening requires that you give full attention to all elements of music. When you first begin to listen for style features, however, it’s natural to focus on one or two elements that are easy for you. To avoid falling into this trap, use the handy checklist below. The list also includes questions and terms to help steer you in the right direction. Don’t hesitate to look it up or ask if you’re uncertain what these words mean—it’s crucial that you understand.

  • Melody—high or low? moves by step or leap? wide or narrow range? regular or uneven phrase lengths? melodic shape and contour?
  • Texture—how many things going on simultaneously? monophonic? polyphonic (with imitation?)? homophonic (homorhythmic or melody & accompaniment?)?
  • Rhythm—clear beat or not? meter? tempo? rhythmic patterns? syncopation? how does time pass?
  • Color—specific instrumental colors? high, medium, or low register? interesting color combinations? overall color? articulation (legato, staccato, etc.)? attack, sustain, and decay characteristics?
  • Harmony—diatonic or chromatic? scale type? stable or unstable? simple (triads) or complex chords? consonant or dissonant?
  • Dynamics—loud or soft? accents? sudden or gradual changes?
  • Form—repetition? contrast? return? variation? overall shape? specific forms?

Where to listen?
The Naxos Music Library and the Classical Music Library, both available on the library’s database page, offer online access to a gazillion high-quality commercial recordings.

Other possibilities include:

  • As long as you reserve a library time in advance, recordings in the Buehler Library can be played using their individual listening facilities.
  • You can use your own listening equipment if your personal collection includes NAWM recordings and/or recordings of the other works on the listening list.
  • You may use your own computer, tablet, or other personal device for streaming audio and video. Be careful with Youtube - not all performances are of highest quality.
Return to top


Score Study

Listening may provide more visceral pleasure than score study, but looking at scores is just as important as listening—and for the same reasons that listening is so crucial. In fact, listening to a performance and mentally reading through a score are not necessarily two different things. Highly trained musicians can “hear” the lines in the score and assemble them in their heads, and that skill is one of the ultimate goals of ear-training and sight-singing exercises in music theory. Even if you have not yet reached that level of sophistication in your own listening, score study remains an invaluable tool in music history. Remember, in most cases the score is the primary source, and the score can often help you spot style features that are difficult to hear—aspects of texture, rhythm, or form, for instance. Further, each score has a “look” that is just as distinctive as the sound of its music. Sensitivity to the visual appearance of a score offers another important tool for the analysis of musical style. Each unit exam will include score excerpts that will test your developing ability “make sense” of written scores. You can follow the link to the massive IMSLP online score library under Musical Scores above.

Return to top


Page created 9/01/20 by Mark Harbold—last updated 9/01/20.