Encounters with Music History
Introduction
Encounters with music history can change your life.
- 
As a result of ongoing encounters with musicologists studying German Renaissance and Baroque 
music, Romantic composer Johannes Brahms wrote several landmark works using techniques, 
forms, and melodies that had little to do with the prevailing style of his era.
 
- 
As a result of his encounter with medieval polyphony from Notre Dame Cathedral, minimalist 
composer Steve Reich found inspiration and affirmation for his techniques of pattern 
repetition, counterpoint, continuous variation
 
- 
As a result of his encounter with ancient Greek writings on music and theater, avant garde 
composer Harry Partch abandoned equal temperament and created musical systems based solely 
on the overtones of a single fundamental pitch
 
- 
As a result of their encounter with early blues recordings by Robert Johnson, “Blind 
Lemon” Jefferson, and others, a whole generation of 1960s musicians
began to take rock music in new directions
 
The nine assignments you undertake this semester provide various encounters with music 
history. These encounters offer the most important means to help you achieve the goals for 
this course—
- 
to acquire basic research skills as you gather, evaluate, and interpret primary sources
 
- 
to communicate your research in varied styles and media
 
- 
to study important western musical styles and composers (up to 1750) through reading, score 
study, and aural analysis
 
- 
to develop listening skills needed for stylistic analysis
 
- 
to look at events and cultures that influenced musical styles and composers
 
- 
to discover how the past touches and influences the present
 
- 
to achieve these goals with enough rigor to prepare you for graduate school entrance exams 
or music education certification exams
 
Further, each assignment offers a unique encounter with music history, a cluster of 
activities focused on a particular historical topic. That should come as no surprise given 
the striking changes that occur in musical styles, techniques, and institutions as we move 
through time. Nonetheless, as the year progresses you will find that we return again and 
again to the same basic tools—readings, research, discussion, paper preparation, 
listening, and score study. This page looks at each tool and describes its importance, 
both within the discipline of music history and for your development as musicians.
Return to top
Return to Music 343 Syllabus
Readings & Research Tools
Reading remains a primary avenue for learning about music history. Figuring out what 
to read requires developing a knowledge of important research tools (information literacy). 
Your textbook provides one important source of information, but serious scholars use a wide 
variety of sources (with special emphasis on primary sources). In your Encounters you will 
encounter many of the principal resource types used for music research, and most of these 
require that you use the library’s print or online resources. The lists below offer 
a preview of these types with explanation of each
one.
Primary & Secondary 
Sources—A primary source is any resource that puts you in 
direct contact with the thing you are studying, without anyone else’s interpretation, 
editorial decisions, or other judgments getting in the way. Primary sources can include 
musical scores (in the original version), letters and other writings by composers and 
other musicians, criticism, programs, advertisements, instruments, works of art, 
buildings, and so on. By contrast, in a secondary source a later scholar 
interprets the facts and organizes them in a coherent narrative. Of course, depending 
on the subject of your study, the same source could be either primary or secondary. 
If you are studying performance practices during Beethoven’s lifetime, then 
a Gramophone review of a CD recording of Beethoven’s music on pianoforte 
is a secondary source. That same review becomes a primary source, however, if you are 
studying changing reactions to Beethoven’s music. As you look at the sources in 
each category below, bear in mind that any source could be primary or 
secondary—depending on the subject of your research.
 
Return to top
Return to Music 343 Syllabus
 
 
Primary Sources
- 
Musical scores—Any scores, in a format as 
close as possible to the composer’s original, are considered primary sources, 
perhaps the most important primary sources in music research. The composer’s own 
autograph score is the true primary source for any work, but a printed edition supervised 
by a conscientious editor is an acceptable substitute. Be careful, though—some scores 
include expression markings and fingerings added by the editor; such interpretations can 
turn these scores into secondary sources.
 
- 
Score anthologies—As 
the name suggests, these are collections of musical compositions. Your music history book 
comes with a score anthology; so do many period histories. Other anthologies are organized 
by repertory. The Liber usualis is the most comprehensive collection of Gregorian 
chant melodies, and 20th century “fake books” provide valuable compilations 
of jazz and pop song classics. To the extent that anthologies give you scores in a format 
as close as possible to the composer’s original, they are primary sources.
 
- 
Scholarly Editions of Early 
Manuscripts and Printed Sources—A surprising number of music anthologies 
from the Middle Ages and Renaissance still exist, though in many cases there is only one 
copy. Many of these anthologies have been microfilmed, and large music libraries possess 
a large collection on microfilm or microfiche. For the rest of us, however, scholarly 
editions serve a valuable purpose. In a typical scholarly edition, the editor provides 
as much information as possible about physical features and condition of the book or 
manuscript; a historical sketch describing how it came into existence and the various 
editions it went through; a comparison of each piece with other versions of the same 
piece in other sources; and commentary on each piece in the book. And, of course, the 
scholarly edition transcribes every score into modern notation. If you can’t get 
to the original, this is the next best thing, and it counts as a primary source. 
In our Renaissance unit, we’ll look at Hewitt’s scholarly edition 
of Canti B.
 
- 
Source Readings—Any 
book with the phrase “source readings” in the title provides a collection 
of primary sources—usually writings by composers and other musicians. These 
are especially valuable because they include in a single volume writings that would 
otherwise be very difficult to find and collect. Women in Music
and Strunk’s Source Readings in Music History are good examples of the genre.
 
- 
Criticism—Music 
critics have been around for a long time, writing for journals, magazines, and newspapers. 
Some of them have even been composers—Schumann, Berlioz, and Cage to name a few! 
Regardless of authorship, criticism is a valuable primary source that allows us to 
understand how a composer’s contemporaries regarded their works. However, criticism 
is not a primary source when it is not written during the composer’s lifetime. 
For example, in Beethoven research a review of a modern pianist playing Beethoven is 
considered a secondary source.
 
- 
Documentary 
Biography—A primary source goldmine! For several important 
composers, scholars have assembled all of the primary documents related to a 
composer’s life—birth certificate, letters, payment receipts, contracts, 
newspaper articles, concert programs, and so on—into a single collection. If you 
are studying Josquin, Bach, Handel, Mozart, Schubert, and several others, you must 
consult these significant sources.
 
Back to Primary & Secondary Sources
Secondary 
Sources & Research Tools
- 
Music Encyclopedias & Dictionaries—While 
these are secondary sources, they provide excellent starting points for quick answers 
to questions or for serious research projects. The New Grove Dictionary of Music and 
Musicians is without question the place to start any research project, 
especially since every article contains a bibliography that lists other important primary 
and secondary sources. Old encyclopedias and dictionaries can be primary sources, 
however—in a study of Renaissance music, the Dictionary of Musical Terms written
by 15th century composer Tinctoris is a primary source.
 
- 
Scholarly 
Journals—Periodical publications like the Musical Quarterly or 
the Journal of the American Musicological Society demonstrate the scholarly 
interests, research methods, and writing style of contemporary musicologists. While 
these are secondary sources, they take you to the cutting edge of
modern musicology.
 
- 
Online 
Databases—How do you find out if there are scholarly journal articles 
on your topic? Databases allow you to search for articles and reviews published in 
scholarly journals, magazines, and other periodical publications. The most important 
database for music research is The Music Index.
 
- 
Biography—Biographies 
can be primary sources if they are written by a composer (autobiography) or by friends 
and acquaintances of a composer (Robert Craft’s writings on Stravinsky, for 
instance). Most biographies are secondary sources, however, though the really 
good ones will quote primary sources at length (Thayer’s Life of 
Beethoven, e.g). Biographies tend to cover both the events of a composer’s 
life and the development of their musical style, with careful attention paid to the 
most important compositions.
 
- 
Period Histories—These 
extremely useful secondary sources provide excellent background material for the 
study of any composer or style. A period history looks carefully at the important composers 
and musical styles from a specific period of music history, either Middle Ages, 
Renaissance, Baroque, Classical, Romantic, or 20th century. Typical titles are Music 
in the Baroque Era or Music of the Renaissance. Especially good are the 
period histories published by W.W. Norton and Prentice Hall.
 
- 
Social Histories & Cultural 
Studies—Reflecting a recent trend in musicology, these books look 
not only at composers and their music but also at the social institutions that support 
music and at the cultures in which music exists. Some, including Fenlon’s The 
Renaissance, focus on a specific period, while others, notably Raynor’s
Social History of Music & Music and Society Since 1815 are broader 
in scope. These secondary sources are especially helpful for the Music 343 paper.
 
- 
Stylistic 
analysis—This specialized genre offers research tools that deal 
with helpful considerations and techniques for the description and analysis of 
musical styles. Representative works include histories of musical styles and 
LaRue’s Guidelines for Style Analysis.
 
- 
Performance 
Studies—What did early music performances sound like? What makes 
Ella sound different than Lady Day? These questions fall in the realm of performance 
studies. Due to the 20th century early music revival, many books are now available 
that describe how music was performed in past eras of music history. For the Music 
343 paper it is extremely important to know about past performance practices. Despite 
their age, Dart’s Interpretation of Music and Donington’s Interpretation 
of Early Music provide good overviews, but there are many current books that go into 
much more detail. These are generally secondary sources, though there are primary 
source treatises
written in the Renaissance and Baroque that deal precisely with these issues.
 
Back to Primary & Secondary Sources
Other Sources
- 
Recordings and Recorded Anthologies—You 
would think that audio and video recordings would be just as important as the written 
score, since they translate the score into the sounds we call music. But performance 
introduces an element of interpretation that may or may not take us closer to the 
composer’s intentions; therefore recorded performances of written scores are 
considered secondary sources. Important exceptions include performances that 
involve the composer as director, performer, or consultant, or where an improvising 
musician creates the music spontaneously, as in jazz recordings. In these cases, 
recordings become primary sources. Recorded anthologies can provide a valuable 
collection of works that would be difficult or expensive to find individually. Examples 
include the Norton Anthology of Western Music, The Best of DooWop, and 
the Smithsonian Collection of Classic Jazz.
 
- 
Web Pages—Web sites 
have become increasingly important sources of information in recent years. Especially 
useful are sites that make primary source materials available. However, these sources 
must be used with care. Not only are they secondary sources, the majority of 
music web pages merely summarize information you can find in more authoritative, 
comprehensive sources. Why take leftovers when you can go to the banquet?
 
- 
Music 
Magazines—These publications are rarely useful to the serious 
scholar. Whether the magazine is Opera News, BBC Magazine, High Fidelity, 
American Stereo Review, Downbeat, Electronic Musician, or something similar, 
these are secondary sources geared towards the interests of a particular 
niche market. If you are studying Bach, Handel, Mozart, or Beethoven, these magazines 
usually say nothing that you can’t find in more authoritative sources. On the 
other hand, if you are studying 20th century opera production techniques, the 
development of commercial MIDI keyboards, the early music revival from the 1960s 
to the present, or interviews with Miles Davis, then Opera
News, Electronic Musician, High Fidelity, and Downbeat (respectively) become 
extremely valuable, and often primary, sources.
 
- 
Historical 
fiction—Based on historical figures, but often very loose with the 
facts, many of these works have found their way onto best-seller lists over the last 
several decades. Barbara Lachman’s Journal of Hildegard of Bingen is 
exceptional in its faithfulness to the historical record, while Peter 
Shaffer’s Amadeus, though a stunning, challenging piece of theater, 
stretches most of the facts to make Salieri’s guilt plausible. No matter 
how well done, historical fiction can make us think, but it is not a tool for serious 
musical research.
 
- 
CD-ROM 
“Companions”—The primary value of these multimedia 
packages lies in their ability to put side-by-side the recording, analysis of 
the music, and background information on the composer, the style, and the culture. 
In most cases these are secondary sources, as with the the Norton CD-ROM 
Masterworks or the ECS packages we will use this year. Nonetheless, when the 
composer helps to create the CD-ROM (Subotnick’s All My Hummingbirds 
Have Alibis), or when many significant historical documents are included 
(Dvorak’s New World Symphony), then the CD-ROM can be considered 
a primary source.
 
Back to Primary & Secondary Sources
Return to top
Return to Music 343 Syllabus
Online Discussion
Scholarly work may seem like a lonely endeavor, but serious advances in music research 
require the participation of a community of scholars. In the section on Course Goals, 
the syllabus mentions that “our ideas and interpretations (hypotheses) must be 
tested by the scholarly community.” No matter how compelling a scholar’s 
arguments may be, they are not accepted as valid until that scholar’s ideas and 
interpretations are evaluated and tested by other experts in the field.
To keep alive that sense of the “community of scholars,” your encounters 
with music history will from time to time ask you to engage in online discussion of 
selected topics. These discussions will ask you to make your best judgments on a topic 
and to evaluate the judgments of other students in this course. This process of 
community interaction provides an important means of coming closer to the “truth” 
of the matter.
Return to top
Return to Music 343 Syllabus
Paper Preparation
This paper demands serious research, and serious research takes time—one-night 
wonders won’t help you understand what musicologists do. It takes time to do 
background research and preparation, to assemble all necessary sources, to study 
primary sources carefully, and to develop your own understanding and interpretation 
of those sources—to grasp their meaning as fully as possible. At the same time, 
big projects work best when you break them down into small, manageable steps. Several 
of your encounters with music history will guide you through some important steps in 
preparing your paper. After all, your paper will be better if you spread the work out 
over two or three months. Click 
here for more information about the paper itself.
Return to top
Return to Music 343 Syllabus
Listening
Why listen?
Would anyone care about U2, the Beatles, Miles, or even N Sync if they couldn’t 
listen to their music? Listening remains the most immediate means of grasping musical meaning, 
and yet this very immediacy lies at the heart of an unusual paradox. We readily grasp 
music’s meaning at an intuitive or emotional level, but to bring our understanding 
to a conscious level and to communicate musical meaning in words can be extremely 
difficult. Hearing is not enough to accomplish these goals. This task requires 
active listening, and the Listening Reports that accompany each Encounter will
help you develop necessary skills.
What is style?
Active listening can mean many things. In music theory it can mean identifying 
intervals, harmonic progressions, or phrase relationships. In this course it means 
attempting to place a work in its historical context by listening for all its 
features, especially those that contribute to our sense of its style. Style, 
simply put, is the characteristic
way a musical work (or body of works) uses the elements of music—melody, texture, 
rhythm, color, harmony, dynamics, form, and so on—to create a unique, identifiable 
sound. We can talk about the style of a particular work, of a composer, of a school, of 
a nation, or of an entire era, but in each case we listen carefully for the characteristic 
elements of that
style. A well-developed sense of style enables us to determine a work’s place in 
music history and to understand how music changes over time.
Listening for style features
Style listening requires that you give full attention to all elements of music. 
When you first begin to listen for style features, however, it’s natural to focus on 
one or two elements that are easy for you. To avoid falling into this trap, use the handy 
checklist below. The list also includes questions and terms to help steer you in the 
right direction. Don’t hesitate to look it up or ask if you’re uncertain what 
these words mean—it’s crucial that you understand.
- 
Melody—high or low? moves by step or leap? wide or narrow range? regular phrases?
 
- 
Texture—thick or thin? active or static? monophonic? polyphonic 
(with imitation?)? homophonic (homorhythmic or melody & accompaniment?)?
 
- 
Rhythm—beat or non-beat? meter? tempo? rhythmic patterns? how does time pass?
 
- 
Color—bright or dark? light or heavy? specific instrumental colors? register?
 
- 
Harmony—diatonic or chromatic? scale? stable or unstable? simple or complex chords?
 
- 
Dynamics—loud or soft? accents? sudden or gradual changes?
 
- 
Form—repetition? contrast? return? variation? overall shape? specific forms?
 
What is a Listening Report?
An integral part of each Encounter, Listening Reports help you practice listening s
kills and prepare for listening quizzes while you explore the music we study. These 
reports should be written while you listen. For an example of proper format, 
click here
to see a sample of Listening Report No. 1.
Listening Report Format?
For each piece you listen to:
a. identify the title and location (library and call number) of the recording
b. identify composer and title (for the entire piece and for each individual section)
c. describe style features—write 2-3 sentences on each movement or number
d. answer any questions in the Encounter
e. indicate number of times (1X, 2X, etc.) you listen to any piece required for quiz 
preparation
How much listening?
The amount varies from 2 to 3.5 hours of music per report; plan on at least 2 hours. 
Basic guideline—listen to one complete LP or CD (or the equivalent) for each hour assigned.
Where to listen?
You can use listening facilities in Buehler Library, or you 
can use your own listening equipment.
What to listen to?
For most reports, specific pieces are required, but after that you can choose any 
recordings (or live performances!) that fit the current Encounter. Start with music 
from NAWM so you can follow the score while you listen. A primary goal is to experience 
as much music as possible. Therefore, you can only count one playing of each 
piece in your total listening time. (Exception: You can count multiple listening for 
any piece that is scheduled for a listening recognition quiz.) Recordings can be found 
in Buehler Library. (NAWM recordings are on Reserve there.) You can also use appropriate recordings
of your own.
Return to top
Return to Music 343 Syllabus
Score Study
Listening may provide more visceral pleasure than score study, but looking at scores is 
just as important as listening—and for the same reasons that listening is so crucial. 
In fact, listening to a performance and mentally reading through a score are not necessarily 
two different things. Highly trained musicians can “hear” the lines in the score 
and assemble them in their heads, and that skill is one of the ultimate goals of ear-training 
and sight-singing exercises in music theory. Even if you have not yet reached that level of 
sophistication in your own listening, score study remains an invaluable tool in music history. 
Remember, in most cases the score is the primary source, and the score can often help 
you spot style features
that are difficult to hear, aspects of texture, rhythm, or form, for instance. Further, each 
score has a “look” that is just as distinctive as the sound of its music. 
Sensitivity to the visual appearance of a score offers another important tool for the 
analysis of musical style. Each unit exam will include score excerpts that will test your 
developing ability “make sense” of written scores.
Return to top
Return to Music 343 Syllabus
Page created 6/12/01 by Mark Harbold—last updated 8/25/02.